THERE is a growing concern in some quarters that the current government of Nigeria is becoming intolerant of criticism. Recent actions by security agencies against those with opposing views are seen as signs of a fascist regime, particularly because the leader comes from a pro-democracy background and has a history of protesting against what he considered anti-people government policies.
The worries are amplified by the arrests, detention and trial of individuals perceived as advocates for good governance and protesters on extreme charges, including treason. The methods used to suppress protests are also seen by civil society elements as extreme in a democratic system. The arrests of journalists and civil society activists, as well as perceived acts of intimidation against freedom of expression, are becoming concerning. These signs are interpreted as the government being intolerant of criticism.
However, it is acknowledged that there are instances of irresponsibility and hyperactive behaviour by individuals and groups that may require urgent government intervention to prevent negative situations. Peace and development cannot be achieved in an environment of lawlessness, which is why there is a call for punishment for bad behaviour. Nevertheless, there should be a clear distinction between misconduct and freedom of expression, as guaranteed by the Constitution.
Undoubtedly, there have been cases of individuals and groups across the nation exhibiting behaviour that suggests they cannot be called in for questioning by security agencies. This is unacceptable in any disciplined society. An invitation from a security agency should be seen primarily as a call for an inquiry. Refusal to comply with a lawful invitation could be seen as insubordination against the state. Exaggerating and criminalising routine invitations and interrogations to curry public sympathy are unhelpful unbecoming acts. No one is, or should be seen, as above the law. Security matters must be taken seriously by everyone, including security agencies, for the well-being of society and its people.
However, the government must refrain from resorting to harsh and oppressive measures. If there are valid reasons for making arrests, the facts should be made public promptly, except if such disclosures would jeopardise national security. The government must refrain from suppressing legitimate and peaceful protests.
If the people are unjustly harassed by the government, they have the legal right to seek redress. If they believe they will not receive justice through the country’s legal system, they may seek recourse from international courts such as the ECOWAS Court or the African Court of Human Rights. The government cannot afford to disregard the decisions of these courts, as doing so might send the wrong signals to the international community. Domestic intolerance of criticism could harm the country’s reputation as an investment destination.
Given the controversy surrounding the current government, its focus should be on rebuilding the trust and confidence of those who had reasons not to embrace it. The government should strive to build social capital instead of taking actions that may further alienate an already aggrieved and traumatised populace. Although its actions might be in the long-term interest of the nation, the government must be intentional in its efforts to carry the people along, even if it requires adopting a more conciliatory approach. Heavy-handedness might backfire.
Nigerian society is already under enormous stress; further pressure could break it. There is widespread hardship caused by various factors, including insecurity, inflation and monumental corruption. There is also a lack of access to basic amenities, and constant failures even where they exist. The government’s focus at this time should be on alleviating the people’s burdens as quickly as possible. It is also the civic responsibility of the people to support the government in swiftly achieving genuine plans by contributing genuine ideas and avoiding unnecessary distractions. No meaningful progress can be made in the face of constant distractions.
While the government may be sensitive to opposition politics and is duty-bound to maintain law and order, transparency regarding the reasons for arrests and persecution of suspects is essential to avoid being labelled as oppressive.
