Ekiti Govt Clarifies: No Sharia Court, Panel in State’s Judicial System
The Ekiti State Government has categorically dismissed reports suggesting the existence of a Sharia Court or the proposed Independent Sharia Arbitration Panel within the state.
This clarification comes after the Independent Sharia Arbitration Panel, led by three Kadhis—Imam Abdullahi Abdul-Mutolib, Imam Abdulraheem Junaid-Bamigbola, and Dr. Ibrahim Aminullahi-Ogunrinde reportedly held its inaugural session earlier this week at the Ado-Ekiti Central Mosque, deliberating on two marriage-related disputes.
In a strongly worded statement issued on the 23rd of January, 2025, the State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Dayo Apata (SAN), firmly denied the panel’s judicial legitimacy.
He emphasized that such an entity is not recognized under Ekiti State’s judicial structure. “Arbitration and mediation matters are quasi-judicial and strictly regulated by law within the state,” Apata clarified.
He outlined the state’s existing legal framework, which includes Customary Courts, the Customary Court of Appeal, and the High Court. These courts have long adjudicated cases involving Islamic, Christian, and traditional marriages, as well as inheritance disputes, without unrest or contention.
Drawing a parallel between northern and southern judicial practices, Apata explained: “Sharia Courts in the North are equivalent to Customary Courts in the South, with appeals proceeding to the Sharia Court of Appeal or Customary Court of Appeal, respectively.” Ekiti State’s judicial mechanisms, he added, are more than sufficient to address customary matters related to Yoruba, Islamic, and Christian marriages, particularly those not formalized under statutory law, which require dissolution by the State High Courts.
Acknowledging the sensitivity of religious issues, Apata urged caution in handling matters that could disrupt the state’s policy of peaceful coexistence.
He warned that the government would not tolerate any actions or rhetoric capable of undermining the prevailing peace or inciting hostility among residents.
Apata also took a swipe at opposition elements, suggesting that the growing political race toward the 2026 governorship election has fueled misinformation campaigns.
He alleged that some groups, unable to fault the government’s performance, are resorting to unethical tactics to stir unrest.
The Attorney-General called on religious leaders to avoid being manipulated by politicians or “fifth columnists” and assured that the government would invoke the full force of the law to uphold the Constitution and maintain harmony in the state.
In conclusion, the Ekiti State Government reiterated its commitment to ensuring peace and safeguarding the integrity of its legal and judicial structures.