Galvanising a new Nigeria with an old anthem

Battered on several fronts by a litany of worries, prominent among which is economic hardship, and ebbing quality of life, the National Assembly, working hand-in-glove with the executive arm of government thinks that reverting to the old national anthem is good enough an elixir for national rebirth and economic rejuvenation. This is at variance with what Nigerians of diverse creeds and religions believe. Consequently, they want the government to get serious with governance and jettison folly if it truly desires a new Nigeria, where patriotic verve among citizens pours out naturally without compulsion, KEHINDE OLATUNJI reports.

Judging from the alleged below-par performance tag placed on President Bola Ahmed Tinubuโ€™s first 365 days in office, as well as a string of scathing criticisms that have continued to pour out, some Nigerians appear convinced that the administration has been of little or no consequence to their wellbeing.

This is further evidenced by the volume of lamentation by groups and individuals from all corners of the country regarding the magnitude of storms that they will continue to weather, as the All Progressives Congress (APC)-led government sustains its call for understanding as things continue to go south.

It was amid the gamut of challenges that the country is facing, but with no clear solution yet in sight, that many were jolted by the decision of the National Assembly to, with military alacrity, pass the National Anthem Bill 2024. An even bigger surprise followed in toe when President Bola Tinubu immediately assented to the bill, a development that effectively saw the restoration of the old national anthem โ€œNigeria, we hail thee,โ€ and jettison the much loved, โ€œArise Oโ€™ Compatriots.โ€

Like other policies, which the government has an immense interest in, and is ready to push to whatever extent irrespective of the wishes and desires of the people, barely 24 hours after Tinubu signed the bill into law, the National Orientation Agency (NOA), yesterday, directed all community orientation and mobilisation officers in the 774 local councils to commit the reintroduced national anthem to memory by June 3, as they โ€œwould be the grassroots marshals for the implementation of this new policy of the government.โ€

It added that it is working โ€œclosely with the National Union of Teachers (NUT) to ensure that schools all over the country are mobilised to start using the current national anthem,โ€ in schools.

The NOAโ€™s Deputy Director of Press, Paul Odeniyi, quoting the agencyโ€™s director general, Lanre Issa-Onilu, said that the directive is part of NOAโ€™s efforts to ensure a seamless transition to the new national anthem.

Issa-Onilu claimed that reverting to the old anthem was part of a national identity project aimed at promoting cohesion and patriotism within the citizenry.

โ€œWe are excited to embark on this new chapter in our national historyโ€ฆWe believe that this new national anthem will inspire a sense of pride and unity among Nigerians, and we are committed to ensuring that every citizen has access to it.โ€

The NOA boss is not the only high-ranking government functionary who sees things through that prism.

Shortly after the bill was signed into law during a joint session of the National Assembly commemorating the Silver Jubilee of Nigeriaโ€™s Fourth Republic, and the โ€œlatestโ€ anthem rendered for the first time, the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, shocked Nigerians when he described the move as one of the most significant things achieved during Tinubuโ€™s first year in office.

โ€œOf all the significant things you have done, I think one of the most important is to take us back to our genealogy; the genealogy of our birth. That though we may belong to different tribes, though we have different tongues, in brotherhood we must stand. Whether in the field of battle or politics, we must hail Nigeria. The best place to start this revolution is the National Assembly where we have the elected representatives of the people,โ€ Akpabio told Tinubu.

Cycling back to the past with old national anthem
LIKE other national symbols,ย the national anthemย represents the tradition, history, and beliefs of a nation and its people. Hence, it helps to evoke feelings of patriotism among Nigerians and reminds them of their nationโ€™s glory, beauty, and rich heritage.

Section 24 of the 1999 Constitution specifically states that it is the duty of every citizen to respect the national anthem because it helps โ€œto enhance the power, prestige and good name of Nigeria, defend Nigeria and render it as may be required.โ€

โ€œArise Oโ€™ Compatriots,โ€ which has been in existence since 1978, is making way for, โ€œNigeria, we hail thee,โ€ which was composed when Nigeria gained independence on October 1, 1960. The anthem played a significant role in shaping Nigeriaโ€™s national identity and unity during the 1960s and late 1970s.

Section 24 of the 1999 Constitution specifically states that it is the duty of every citizen to respect the national anthem because it helps โ€œto enhance the power, prestige and good name of Nigeria, defend Nigeria and render it as may be required.โ€

Thatโ€™s why many were surprised when the National Assembly initiated moves to revert to โ€œNigeria, We Hail Thee,โ€ย inherited from the colonial masters.

The old national anthem was adopted during Nigeriaโ€™s independence from Britain on October 1, 1960. Its lyrics were written by a British expatriate and lyricist, Lillian Jean Williams, while Francesย Berda,ย composed the music.

However, in 1978 it ceased to be theย countryโ€™sย national anthem because of the re-orientation efforts of the military government to shelve some of the vestiges of colonialism and preach patriotism after the Nigerian Civil War.

With the needย to haveย a national anthem that reflected her cultural diversity and unity, the military administration of General Olusegun Obasanjo changed the national anthem to the one discarded by the Tinubu administration.

Tinubu at the National Assembly

The rested anthem was composed by Benedict Odiase, who served in the Nigeria Police Force between 1954 and 1992. He was also the Music Director of the Nigerian Police Band and the Midwest State Police Band.

According to the National Archive of Nigeria, the country adopted that anthem to,ย โ€œpromote national ownership, as the composer of the previous anthem was a British expatriate, stating thatย โ€œArise, O Compatriots,โ€ย wasย originallyย written as a poem by five different writers, but it was Odiaseย whoย was taskedย with putting the poem to music.

Theย lyrics of the anthemย were takenย from five of the best entries in a national contestย andย theย winners were P. O. Aderibigbe, John A. Ilechukwu, Dr. Sota Omoigui, Eme Etim Akpan, and B.A.ย Ogunnaike.

The National Anthem Bill 2024 sponsored byย House Leader, Julius Ihonvbere,ย and Senate Leader Opeyemi Bamidele, simultaneously at both chambers was at the instance of President Bola Tinubu, who had severally expressed his preference for the old anthem during his campaign.

For instance, in 2011, President Tinubu, as the leader of one of the main opposition parties,ย calledย for the adoption of the anthem in place of the current one.

He had also during his speech at theย Nigerian Institute of Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), Kuru, Jos, Plateau State said, โ€œAbandoning the post-independence anthem, which arguably evoked a strong spirit of patriotism and brotherliness, to compose a very drab replacement, is far less inspirational.โ€

However, proponents of the old anthem have also argued that the 2014 National Conference adopted the latest anthem and regarded, โ€œNigeria we hail theeโ€ as a better symbol of unity, peace, and prosperity.

Butย some lawmakers said the lyrics of the recently jettisoned anthem were vague and did not evoke the desired emotion, or reflect the aspirations of Nigerians. They also argued that the old (new) anthem would promote unity and progress in the country.

Dissent views from within lawmakers
IT is worthy to point out that while most national lawmakers scampered to please the president by fast-tracking a return to the old anthem, others begged to differ, including a member, representing Jere Federal Constituency, Borno State, Ahamad Satomi, who challenged his colleagues to convince Nigerians about the relevance of the law at this time.

His concerns highlighted the disconnect between legislative actions and the real-world problems faced by Nigerians.

He said: โ€œI do not know how this national anthem will affect the wellbeing of theย common manย in Nigeria.ย Letโ€™sย be realistic. How will this stop hunger, banditry, or improve security?ย Satomi asked.

Heย emphasisedย the need for legislation that directly benefits theย populace,ย rather than symbolic gestures, even as he urged his colleagues toย prioritiseย development-oriented policies that would attract positive international attention and foster growth while expressing frustration over the focus on the national anthemย whileย the world advances in technology and innovation.

He added: ย โ€œThere is a saying that goes thus,ย โ€˜Countries that rely on prayers willย relyย on the ones that think.โ€

Before passing the bill for the Presidentโ€™s signature, the Deputy Senate President, Barau Jibrin, had suggested that the โ€œmotherlandโ€ in the anthem be replaced with โ€œfatherlandโ€ because of religious perspectives.

Also, Senator Adams Oshiomhole argued that the โ€œnative landโ€ in the anthem be replaced with either โ€œmotherland or fatherlandโ€.

He also recommended that the โ€œtribeโ€ should be replaced with โ€œethnic,โ€ but all the observations were jettisoned to achieve a purpose, which is yet to be known to Nigerians.

Majoring in minor
MANY stakeholders in Project Nigeria believe that reverting to the old anthem is simply a frivolous step that lacks merit, empathy, and good thinking.

Speaking withย The Guardian, a former Deputy Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for Somalia, Babafemiย Badejo,ย alleged that the legislators wanted to erase one of the legacies of General Olusegun Obasanjo as again spurring any spirit of patriotism.

According to him, if the legislators wanted purposeful and beneficial change, they should facilitate the jettisoning of the military-foisted constitution that many Nigerians are unhappy about.

Badejo,ย who isย a legal practitioner and professor of political science and international relations at Chrisland University, Abeokuta, asked lawmakers to explain when Nigerians complained to them that they needed a new national anthem when they are facingย seriousย socioeconomicย problems, corruption, and insecurity.

Insisting that, โ€œChange should be progressive and not retrogressive,โ€ Badejo added: โ€œIf we want to do away with what the militaryย foistedย on us, we should be talking about changing the Constitution, which I believe is our fundamental problem as a nation, and not one national song for an older one that does not show seriousness as a nation. It does not show leadership.

โ€œThere are words in the just-approved anthem that are problematic today. For instance, the Yoruba, Igbo, Fulani, Ijaw, Ibibio, Hausa, etc., are described as tribes in the old anthem, but theyย shouldnโ€™tย be. These are nationalities that are respectively bigger than many European nation-states. You cannot call people who are of the magnitude of 50-60 million people a tribe.ย Donโ€™tย denigrate the people. Why are we going back to the stupidity of the past?โ€

He added that if the country has the luxury of wanting a change of anthem,ย โ€œthen call on all Nigerians to compete on lyrics and the tune for a new song. We can select one. But it is retrogressive to drop what we have had since 1978 for some vague reasons and replace it with what colonial powers foisted on us.โ€

The National Publicityย Secretary of the Youth Party (YP),ย Ayodele Adio, shares Badejoโ€™s views, stressing that the Senate had toย be constantly remindedย that they were elected to represent various constituencies across Nigeria hence the need for extensive consultations before decisions like changing the national anthemย are taken.

According to him, there should have been a certain level of public engagement to ensure that citizens consent to whatever changesย are proposed before they are carried out.

โ€œUnfortunately, and quite embarrassingly, they have carried on as shepherds without flocks. If they had engaged the people, they would haveย been remindedย of their priorities given theย socioeconomicย realities of millions of Nigerians.โ€

He described the law as a misplaced priority, saying the government is either out of touch or cannot provide solutions to the challenges that Nigerians are grappling with, adding that it was utterly insensitive for the government to distract Nigerians with a change of anthem when the country itself is on the brink of starvation.

He said:ย โ€œHundreds of citizensย are kidnappedย weekly, and bandits and terrorists kill several. Food inflation is pushing at over 40 per cent, and several local manufacturing businesses are folding up. Still, one of the highest-paid legislative bodies in the world would rather debate an anthem that proffers solutions or sacrifice their perks as a mark of solidarity with their constituents.

โ€œWithout mincing words, no country can make significant progress with an overpaid, out-of-touch legislatureย that is insensitive to the plights of its constituents.ย A system that rewards a politician with wealth, but leaves his constituency inย abjectย poverty is โ€˜clientelismโ€™ and will never deliver progress and prosperity.โ€

Also, of the view that the anthem change constitutes a misplaced priority as well as a waste of time is Prof. Gbengaย Okunlola, of the University of Ibadan.

Heย said given the many challenges yearning for attention in the country, the least thing that the government should be concerned about is reverting to an old national anthem.

He said: โ€œThere are lots of things that have to do with health, economy, and mining, among others, but theseย thingsย are not takenย intoย consideration.ย I think we shouldย get serious as a nation. Are Nigerians that are on the streets demanding a new anthem? Is that what we need at the moment?ย There are soย many issues that need toย be takenย seriously,ย letโ€™sย get seriousย please.โ€

For Kunleย Okunade, a political analyst, the action of government is simply frivolous, as there are a million and one things that the president and legislators could channel their energiesย to,ย which would improve the lives of ordinary Nigerians.

โ€œThereโ€™sย the new minimum wage matterย that isย still hanging and moving at millipede speed.ย Thereโ€™sย the issue of insecurity that has refused to go to bed. You could channel your conversations and efforts towards lending more hands to our securityย architecture,ย and helping themย towards consolidating onย their efforts in fighting this menace,โ€ย he said.

On his part, a legal practitioner, Abasumo Bassey, said that the โ€œfast track process of legislating โ€˜Nigeria We Hail Thee..โ€™ back into the top echelon of our national songs not only reminds us about another speedy legislation passed in the same week, and which served to reinstall a previously dethroned first class traditional ruler, but it also serves as a sad reminder on how our national and legislative ethos has been so eroded even as the nation counts down to 25 years of uninterrupted civilian administration.

โ€œCivilian administration, yes, but certainly not a democratic one. The past 25 years have seen Nigerians witness some of the most flagrant abuses of the foundations of democratic governance. Some of the most draconic military administrations in our history will recoil at the level of lawlessness, ineptitude, and incomprehensible disregard for the tenets of democratic governance. Whilst the executive has been known to exhibit excesses even in the most democratic of nations, the country has seen a downward trend in the quality of legislative debates and processes emanating out of the National Assembly.

โ€œIn giving what should be the most cogent justification for the Bill, the Senate Leader (who sponsored the Bill itself), said the old anthem aligns with the vision of President Bola Tinubuโ€™s administration and will promote national unity. Really? So, the very symbol of our national cohesion can be circumscribed to fit into the political prism of a nascent political coalition, which has only been in power for the past nine years!โ€

Bassey added: โ€œThe advent of democratic governance is no basis to do away with everything done under a military government. For whatever it is worth, military governments are known to have benefitted from the expertsโ€™ opinions and professionalism of select civilian eggheads in the formulation, debate, and execution of most of its most laudable policies. The Highway Code, the National Youth Service Scheme, the concept of Federal Character, the Land Use Act, and even the foundations of our constitutional democracy have all been handed down by the military.โ€