SOCIAL media influencer Martins Otse, also known as VeryDarkMan, has filed an application with the Lagos High Court seeking permission to appeal the ruling issued by Justice Matthias Dawodu on October 14, 2024.
This ruling ordered him to remove defamatory videos and comments about Senior Advocate of Nigeria Femi Falana and his son Folarin, popularly known as Falz.
The defamatory remarks were made during a recorded conversation that alleged they received N10 million from the well-known crossdresser Idris Okuneye, also known as Bobrisky, to undermine justice.
In that ruling, Justice Dawodu also prohibited VeryDarkMan from releasing, publishing, or circulating any further defamatory videos and comments against the senior lawyer and his son on all his social media platforms until the case filed by the two is heard.
In two separate motions filed with the court, Verydarkman requested an extension of time to seek permission to appeal the court’s decision.
In the motion, dated October 18 and based on seven grounds, VeryDarkMan argued that “the court order was based solely on the respondent’s affidavit” and that, as it is an interlocutory order, he requires the court’s permission to exercise his constitutional right to appeal.
He contended that while “it is within the court’s discretion to grant or deny leave to appeal, such discretion should be exercised in a judicial and judicious manner.”
He also claimed that a denial of the request would result in a miscarriage of justice, as the case raises important legal questions that deserve further examination.
He stated, “Denying leave may lead to the enforcement of a decision that does not accurately apply the law, resulting in consequences that could harm not only the parties involved but also the broader administration of justice.
“The appellate court plays a crucial role in clarifying and correcting trial court decisions, which is essential for maintaining the integrity of the judicial system.”
Oladimeji Joseph, a legal practitioner who submitted an affidavit in support of the motion, noted that he is aware of the court’s findings regarding VeryDarkMan’s inability to compensate the claimant if the judgment is unfavorable, thus prompting the appeal.
Joseph further asserted, “I know for certain that leave from this Honourable Court is necessary before the Defendant can appeal the ruling.
“The Defendant has 14 days from the date of the ruling to seek the leave of this Honourable Court and file an appeal.”
He urged the court to grant the applicant’s request.
